The government of the United Kingdom has announced plans to crack down on antisocial behaviour, including criminalising the possession of nitrous oxide (laughing gas). In spite of the advice of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) that nitrous oxide should not be banned, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak stated that a “zero-tolerance” policy was necessary.
The $160 million plan will also address homelessness, panhandling, and vandalism. The law prohibits the manufacture, distribution, and importation of nitrous oxide for human consumption, but not its possession. The proposed prohibition would be issued pursuant to the Misuse of Drugs Act of 1971, which regulates drugs based on their perceived toxicity and potential for abuse.
Experts have warned that a blanket ban is “completely disproportionate” and “would likely do more harm than good” because it will not prevent individuals from utilising the petrol and will drive it into the hands of criminals. David Badcock, a member of the Drug Science Scientific Committee, described the proposed ban as “disappointing” and accused the government of “going against its own advisory panel” Transform Drug Policy Foundation’s Steve Rolles added that criminalising nitrous oxide would “hand over control of the product to criminal gangs.”
Chris Philp, the minister of public safety, expressed concern that nitrous oxide was being consumed “on a massive scale.” Leveling Up Secretary Michael Gove stated that the recreational use of laughing gas has a “unacceptable” impact on the public’s perception of safety. Lucy Powell, the shadow culture secretary, stated that its use “causes an enormous amount of littering and antisocial behaviour.”
The government of the United Kingdom has announced plans to combat antisocial behaviour by implementing stricter penalties for littering, graffiti, and fly-tipping, giving communities a say in how offenders are punished, and increasing funding for youth centres. The most controversial aspect of the plan is the proposed ban on the possession of laughing gas, despite the ACMD’s recommendation that it not be banned. Experts are concerned that this measure will have little effect on its use and will drive it into the hands of criminals. In addition, they argue that reducing risks through education is preferable to regulation. However, the government argues that nitrous oxide contributes to antisocial behaviour and must be regulated to ensure the safety of public spaces.
